Reaction from the field
The relationship between Faith Kates, a prominent figure in the modeling industry, and the late Jeffrey Epstein has come under scrutiny, revealing significant implications for the safety of models and the ethical responsibilities of those in power. Kates, who ran Next Management until November 2025, maintained a close friendship with Epstein, introducing him to numerous models over their nearly 40-year association. This connection raises critical questions about the influence and responsibility of industry leaders in safeguarding their clients.
Kates, now 68 years old, offered support to Epstein following his 2009 conviction for soliciting a child for prostitution. Emails uncovered during investigations show that Kates and Epstein communicated extensively, with over 5,000 mentions of Kates in the files. This correspondence indicates a deep level of interaction that continued even after Epstein’s legal troubles, suggesting a troubling disregard for the implications of their relationship.
Despite the troubling nature of their connection, Kates’ spokesperson has asserted that she never placed a model in harm’s way. This statement comes in the wake of interviews with models who were connected to Epstein through Kates, none of whom alleged any abuse. However, the mere existence of these connections raises ethical concerns about Kates’ role in facilitating access to Epstein, particularly given the serious nature of his offenses.
In a notable instance, Epstein offered Kates a $6 million loan to buy out her co-owners at Next Management, which she declined. This financial gesture, while not accepted, underscores the complex dynamics at play in their relationship. Kates was reportedly involved in discussions about introducing models to Epstein even after his first prison sentence, further complicating her legacy in the industry.
Next Management has publicly stated that Kates’ relationship with Epstein was unknown to them until recent disclosures, highlighting a potential disconnect between Kates’ personal actions and the company’s ethical standards. The spokesperson for Next Management expressed regret, stating, “To the extent Ms Kates’ independent actions impacted or involved Next clients and employees, we are deeply sorry.” This acknowledgment reflects the broader implications of Kates’ actions on the modeling community.
As the investigation continues, the modeling industry faces a reckoning regarding the safety and well-being of models. The connections between Kates and Epstein serve as a reminder of the potential dangers that can arise when personal relationships intersect with professional responsibilities. The industry must grapple with the legacy of figures like Kates and the ethical considerations that come with their influence.
Looking ahead, the ramifications of Kates’ relationship with Epstein may prompt further scrutiny of industry practices and the need for greater accountability among those in positions of power. While Kates has stepped down from her role at Next Management to focus on charity work, the questions surrounding her past actions and their impact on the modeling world remain unresolved. Details remain unconfirmed, and the industry must remain vigilant in ensuring the safety of its models.